Are all these digital innovations carbon sustainable?

In today’s rapidly advancing technological landscape, data centers are playing a pivotal role in driving innovation across laboratory technology. These data centers, however, come at a cost – a significant and often hidden carbon footprint.

As laboratories increasingly rely on cutting-edge technologies, the environmental impact of data centers powering these advancements cannot be and should not be ignored.

Dark carbon footprints

Data centers are the backbone of modern information technology, enabling the storage, processing, and dissemination of vast amounts of data. However, these facilities require substantial energy to function, often relying on fossil fuels to meet their power demands. As a result, data centers are responsible for a substantial portion of global carbon emissions. The rising demand for data-driven technologies, including those used in laboratories, has only exacerbated this issue.

White wet barefoot human footprint

Labs are increasingly reliant on sophisticated computational tools, simulations, and data analysis techniques to conduct experiments, analyse results, and make groundbreaking discoveries. These technologies demand powerful computing resources, which in turn require energy-intensive data centers to operate. From genome sequencing to climate modeling, laboratories leverage data-driven technologies to push the boundaries of scientific knowledge. Unfortunately, the carbon emissions associated with these advancements threaten the very environment scientists are striving to understand and protect.

The Need for Sustainable Solutions

Addressing the carbon footprint of data centers powering laboratory technology requires a multifaceted approach. Firstly, there is a need for greater energy efficiency within data centers. Implementing advanced cooling systems, optimizing server configurations, and utilizing renewable energy sources can significantly reduce their environmental impact. Moreover, data centers can explore innovative technologies like liquid cooling and artificial intelligence-driven energy management to further enhance efficiency.

Secondly, there is a pressing need for the scientific community to advocate for sustainable practices. Researchers and scientists must collaborate with data center operators, governments, and environmental organizations to raise awareness about the environmental consequences of data center operations. By fostering partnerships, promoting energy-efficient technologies, and advocating for policies that incentivize renewable energy adoption, the scientific community can contribute to mitigating the impact of carbon emissions from data centers.

Lastly, there needs to be more transparency about these issues and these costs. There is an argument to be made for clear reporting by data centers on their carbon generation per watt of energy they use and how that relates to the various processing tasks that are being requested. The IEA (International Energy Agency) estimates that around 3.5% of greenhouse emissions are from data centres but that estimate comes with a lot of caveats due to poor reporting. Making researchers aware of the carbon impact of their research would not only help educate but also help the research make carbon sensible decisions.

As scientific research becomes increasingly reliant on data-driven technologies, it is imperative to address the environmental consequences of these advancements. By focusing on energy efficiency, fostering collaboration between the scientific community and data center operators, and advocating for supportive government policies, we can work towards a sustainable future where cutting-edge laboratory technology innovations do not come at the cost of our planet.

Now more than ever sustainability needs to be a core part of any new advancement.


Matthew has been writing and cartooning since 2005 and working in science communication his whole career. Matthew has a BSc in Biochemistry and a PhD in Fibre Optic Molecular Sensors and has spent around 16 years working in research, 5 of which were in industry and 12 in the ever-wonderful academia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *